Nobel Peace Prize Goes On Without Trump

The Nobel Peace Prize will be awarded this year without Donald Trump on the shortlist, even as the five-member committee in Oslo weighs how his presence in the White House might shape their choice.

I read the Reuters report over my morning coffee and felt a small, quiet relief. Not triumph. Not gloating. Just relief that the committee has drawn a clear line. A president waging war with Iran will not win the world’s most visible peace award. That much is settled.

US President Donald Trump will not win the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The reason is plain. He is engaged in an ongoing conflict with Iran, a war that began in February and has drawn in Israel as well. Peace prizes do not go to leaders who are actively at war, no matter how many times they say they want one.

Trump has made no secret of his desire to win the Nobel. He lobbied hard for last year’s award, a move that was unusual in the prize’s 125-year history. When he did not win, the prize went to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado. Weeks later, she handed her gold medal to Trump in a bid to win his support for her cause. The Nobel Committee said the medal was non-transferable, a small but firm reminder that the award belongs to the recipient, not to politics.

This year, Trump has been nominated again. Leaders from Cambodia, Israel and Pakistan have publicly said they put his name forward. But being nominated does not mean much. The committee does not confirm or deny nominees. Names leak. Speculation grows. The actual shortlist stays hidden for 50 years. Experts who follow the prize say Trump’s chances are quite low. Some say near-zero.

The announcement comes on October 9. By then, the committee will have met in secret, reviewed files, argued, and voted. Five people hold the fate of this award in their hands. They work in Oslo. They are independent of the Norwegian government. They answer to no one but their own judgment of what peace means in a given year.

This year, their job is harder than most. The world is full of wars. Sudan. Ukraine. Yemen. Iran and the Middle East. The prize could go to Pope Leo, who has spoken out against Trump’s Iran policy and was called weak by the president for it. It could go to the International Criminal Court or the International Court of Justice. It could go to Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Or to emergency teams in Sudan, or children’s advocates in Ukraine. The field is wide. The stakes are high.

What strikes me is not the list of names. It is the quiet pressure the committee feels. Experts say the five-member body will be mindful of picking someone who can withstand pressure from Trump. That is a new kind of calculation. Not who did the most for peace. Not who took the biggest risk. But who can hold the award without being bullied, shamed, or forced to give it away.

I worry about what that means for the prize itself. The Nobel Peace Prize has always been political. It has honored activists, presidents, courts, and organizations. It has snubbed some and surprised others. But it has always tried to stand apart from the day’s fights. Now the committee must think about how a winner might be treated by a president who wants the prize and did not get it. That is a burden no award should carry.

Still, I am glad they have ruled Trump out. Not because I enjoy seeing anyone denied. But because the line matters. A war is a war. A peace prize is a peace prize. If the committee had bent that rule, the award would have lost something hard to get back.

Trump’s influence will be felt by the awarding body, experts say. That is not a compliment. It is a warning. It means the committee must choose with care. They must pick someone whose work stands on its own. Someone who does not need a president’s blessing. Someone who can hold a gold medal and say no when asked to hand it over.

The winner will be named in four days. The ceremony is on December 10 in Oslo. Until then, the guessing will continue. Markets will shift. Names will rise and fall. Reporters will call experts. Experts will hedge. And the five people in Oslo will sit behind closed doors and do the hardest part of their job. They will choose a winner who can carry the weight of the moment without breaking.

I do not know who they will pick. I only know who they will not pick. And for now, that feels like enough.

More on: World News