Ilhan Omar Once Called Her Father “Nur Said” in a Deleted Tweet
A 2013 Father’s Day message from Ilhan Omar called her father “Nur Said.” That name resembles part of the name of her former husband, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, and the old post has been pulled back into public view at a moment when Omar is already under scrutiny.
The tweet, posted on what was then Twitter, read, “Happy Father’s Day to my aabo Nur Said, I am forever grateful to Allah for giving me the best father.” “Aabo” is the Somali word for father. The post is no longer available at its original address, and reporting has not established exactly when or why it was removed.
My first reaction was caution. A shared or similar name can look like a revelation when it is stripped of context. It can also be a coincidence, a nickname, a translation issue, or simply the way names work in a family and a culture. Before a name becomes proof, it needs records, testimony, or corroboration.
What the post shows
The documented fact is narrow: Omar publicly referred to her father as “Nur Said” in June 2013. An archived version of the message has been widely reported, and the original post was later deleted.
Other public references have identified Omar’s late father as Nur Omar Mohamed. A Congressional Black Caucus statement after his death in 2020 used that name. So the tweet does raise a fair question about naming: why did Omar use “Nur Said” for her father in that post?
Omar’s office has said “Nur Said” was a childhood nickname used by her father, including on public profiles, and that the post was removed after people posted disturbing, doctored images of him. That explanation is a claim from her side, not an independent finding.
What it does not show
The larger claim is that Omar married her brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, possibly to help him obtain immigration status. Omar has repeatedly denied that Elmi is her brother and has denied immigration fraud.
No court has found that Omar committed immigration fraud. The alleged sibling relationship has not been publicly established. A name overlap, even a close one, does not establish that two people share a father.
Fact-checkers have reached a similar conclusion. Snopes has described the brother-marriage claim as unfounded, saying the available claims are circumstantial and unsubstantiated. It also noted that similar names alone do not prove that Omar’s father was also the father of Ahmed Nur Said Elmi.
That matters. The tweet is being treated by some as a clue. A clue can point somewhere. It cannot stand in for evidence.
Why this is hard to talk about
Omar is a public official, and public officials should expect scrutiny of their records, their finances, and their statements. That is ordinary accountability.
But this particular allegation has traveled for years with very little solid grounding. Reporting has traced the claim to an anonymous online post that supplied no evidence. Omar has called the allegation baseless and has denied it repeatedly.
There is also a human cost here. A person’s father, marriage, refugee history, and family names are not abstract political props. When a claim spreads without proof, the people named in it carry the damage even if the claim later falls apart.
I do not think the right response is to dismiss every question. The deleted post is real. The name similarity is real. The fact that Omar’s office gave an explanation for the deletion is real. Those things deserve plain, careful reporting.
The right response is to keep the line between question and conclusion visible. A deleted tweet can be examined. It cannot convict anyone.
What remains open
Newsweek reported that it had not established when or why the post was removed. Omar’s office has offered a reason, but the public record does not independently settle the timing or motive.
The broader federal scrutiny of Omar’s immigration records is separate from the sibling allegation. The existence of an investigation does not prove fraud, and it does not prove that Elmi was Omar’s brother.
So the honest version is this: the tweet is a real artifact, the name resemblance is real, and the explanation for it remains contested. Everything beyond that remains unproven.
A name in an old Father’s Day post should not decide a person’s reputation. Facts should. Until there are facts strong enough to carry the weight, the careful answer is not “nothing to see” or “case closed.” It is simpler: we do not know, and we should say so.
Explore: Politics